Three Templates for Introductions to Political Science

Figuring out how to compose solid acquaintances with diary articles perkenalan diri dalam bahasa inggris is one of the most significant abilities to

create as a scholastic. Nonetheless, most youthful researchers don’t obtain this ability until they start

accumulating dismissal letters, frequently with phrases like “ineffectively stated,” “ought to be surrounded in an unexpected way,”

“not certain what the commitment is,” or “muddled why I should try understanding this.” (I talk from

individual experience, both on the giving and getting end.) Whether they understand it or not, what

the refs are frequently attempting to let you know with these objections is “the presentation sucks.”

Notwithstanding the away from of composing solid presentations, and numerous articles and books about

scholarly writing in general,1

I am uninformed of any guide committed exclusively to the craftsmanship and science

of the presentation. One may think this is on the grounds that there are no principles, or that lone practice and

experience can instruct how to compose those initial hardly any pages. The primary guidance I got as an alumni

understudy and in the years soon after graduating was to have coaches and other experienced authors

peruse my work and to notice their (definitely brutal) analysis. No guide can completely save you from

this cycle. Notwithstanding, in the wake of perusing numerous presentations across top political theory diaries (and

related fields) so as to offer some guidance to graduate understudies in a composing course, I was amazed

to discover there truly are relatively few different ways to structure a presentation.

Desmond Tan at long last uncovers truth behind run in with ex-BFF Rebecca Lim

It was perhaps the greatest nonton drakor baru riddle in the nearby showbiz industry and now, Desmond Tan is at last revealing some insight into it.

In the latest scene of Hear U Out — a meWATCH syndicated program by neighborhood have Quan Yi Fong ⁠—the 34-year-old entertainer let the cat out of the bag on his kinship with individual artiste Rebecca Lim and what caused the crack between the previous BFFs years prior.

Basically, it was a misconception between the two superstars. Desmond didn’t go into the points of interest in spite of Yi Fong’s testing, yet he portrayed it as something that could transpire. In any case, he conceded that he accomplished something incorrectly and didn’t understand it.

He clarified: “I accomplished something and she didn’t comprehend why I did it that way. Yet, I likewise didn’t realize I accomplished something incorrectly.”

Desmond just found out about it later on and he admitted that it was “somewhat imbecilic”.

“We were both occupied with our lives and we quit reaching each other so much. However, I thought it was regular. We were all occupied with our own professions. At that point I understood we had gradually quit conversing with each other. So I asked and that is the point at which I got some answers concerning this misconception,” he said.

Ashby, Dwan on Top in July

Richard Ashby (formerly known as “Judi Online“) and Tom “durrrr” Dwan are currently having the most profitable months on Full Tilt Poker so far in July.

Both players are up around $1 million dollars (Ashby is up $932k, while Dwan is up $912k).

Other players who are enjoying strong months in July are:

Di “Urindanger” Dang (+625k)
Rafi “howisitfeellike” Amit (+603k)
Brian Townsend (+531k)

A few familiar names have popped up in the high-stakes games over the past couple of days.

David Benyamine has reappeared on the site as a “red” Full Tilt Poker pro once again.

There were rumors swirling around a few months ago that Benyamine was going to sign a deal with another room (Betfair and Pokerstars were the rumored destinations), but this obviously never happened.

Benyamine has now ditched his “MR B 2 U SON” alias and is back playing as “David Benyamine”.

According to, Benyamine is down around $260k since returning to the site.

Also making an appearance recently? Brian Townsend, formerly known as “sbrugby”.

Townsend destroyed the biggest games online back in the day, and then dropped down in an effort to rebuild his confidence and bankroll after suffering through a downswing.


Getting started in poker for the first time can be a scary prospect, learning the rules, hand rankings and memorizing strategies is daunting, but the truth is, Situs Poker Online is far more straightforward than it appears.


Depending on how fast you pick up the basic rules, you can realistically learn enough to start playing in about 20 minutes, but it might take another one to six months before you have a grasp on the nuances of the game.

Most of the widely played poker variants have simple rulesets, which is a significant factor in why they are so popular. However, the best way to learn is by playing, whether that be at a home game, or an online free to play version. No amount of research can replace time at the tables.


Five Card Draw is one of the best poker variants to learn first because of its relatively simple ruleset. There are only two phases, and one draw phase in Five Card Draw and the card ranking system is used across multiple types of poker.

Texas Hold’em is an excellent second choice for beginners. It’s by far the most popular variant in the world and has huge amounts of information on how to play in books, the internet, movies, and even video games. Texas Hold ’em is a little more complicated than Five Card Draw with four phases and community cards, but is still a good entry game for poker beginners.


Poker is an incredibly versatile game that is continuously evolving, new games are invented every year and old games blink out of existence forever. Regardless of the rule variation, all poker variants will fall into one of three categories.

Draw—Has at least draw phase where players can replace the cards they were dealt at the start of the game.

Examples—Badgui and Five Cards Draw are the two most popular games in this category.

Stud—Players are dealt a combination of face up and face down cards as part of their hand.

Examples—Seven Card Stud, Five Card Stud and Razz poker fall into this category.

Community—During play, several community cards are dealt in the middle. Players can use any of the cards they are dealt at the start, and the community cards to make the best possible hand.

Examples—Texas Hold’em and Omaha Poker are the two most widely played community card games.

Quantum internet breakthrough could help make hacking a thing of the past

The advent of mass working from home has made many people more aware of the security risks of sending sensitive information via the internet and dont forget foor Iphone Cases. The best we can do at the moment is make it difficult to intercept and hack your messages — but we can’t make it impossible.

What we need is a new type of internet: the quantum internet and LG Cases. In this version of the global network, data is secure, connections are private and your worries about information being intercepted are a thing of the past.

My colleagues and I have just made a breakthrough, published in Science Advances, that will make such a quantum internet possible by scaling up the concepts behind it using existing telecommunications infrastructure.

Our current way of protecting online data is to encrypt it using mathematical problems that are easy to solve if you have a digital “key” to unlock the encryption but hard to solve without it. However, hard does not mean impossible and, with enough time and computer power, today’s methods of encryption can be broken.
Quantum communication, on the other hand, creates keys using individual particles of light (photons) , which — according to the principles of quantum physics — are impossible to make an exact copy of. Any attempt to copy these keys will unavoidably cause errors that can be detected. This means a hacker, no matter how clever or powerful they are or what kind of supercomputer they possess, cannot replicate a quantum key or read the message it encrypts.

This concept has already been demonstrated in satellites and over fiber-optic cables, and used to send secure messages between different countries. So why are we not already using it in everyday life? The problem is that it requires expensive, specialized technology that means it’s not currently scalable.

Previous quantum communication techniques were like pairs of children’s walkie talkies. You need one pair of handsets for every pair of users that want to securely communicate. So if three children want to talk to each other they will need three pairs of handsets (or six walkie talkies) and each child must have two of them. If eight children want to talk to each other they would need 56 walkie talkies.

Obviously it’s not practical for someone to have a separate device for every person or website they want to communicate with over the internet. So we figured out a way to securely connect every user with just one device each, more similar to phones than walkie talkies.

Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users

Some people think that usability is very costly and complex and that user tests should be reserved for the rare web design project with a huge budget and a lavish time schedule. Not true. Elaborate usability tests are a waste of resources. The best results come from testing no more and Iphone Cases than 5 users and running as many small tests as you can afford.

In earlier research, Tom Landauer and I showed that the number of usability problems found in a usability test with users is:

where is the total number of usability problems in the design and is the proportion of usability problems discovered while testing a single user. The typical value of is 31%, averaged across a large number of projects we studied. Plotting the curve for =31% gives the following result:

The most striking truth of the curve is that zero users give zero insights.

As soon as you collect data from a single test user, your insights shoot up and you have already learned almost a third of all there is to know about the usability of the design. The difference between zero and even a little bit of data is astounding.

When you test the second user, you will discover that this person does some of the same things as the first user, so there is some overlap in what you learn. People are definitely different, so there will also be something new that the second user does that you did not observe with the first user LG Cases. So the second user adds some amount of new insight, but not nearly as much as the first user did.

The third user will do many things that you already observed with the first user or with the second user and even some things that you have already seen twice. Plus, of course, the third user will generate a small amount of new data, even if not as much as the first and the second user did.

As you add more and more users, you learn less and less because you will keep seeing the same things again and again. There is no real need to keep observing the same thing multiple times, and you will be very motivated to go back to the drawing board and redesign the site to eliminate the usability problems.

After the fifth user, you are wasting your time by observing the same findings repeatedly but not lea